For Christmas I got a fascinating gift from a buddy - my really own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was completely written by AI, with a couple of easy triggers about me provided by my good friend Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of composing, but it's also a bit recurring, and extremely verbose. It may have surpassed Janet's prompts in looking at data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually offered around 150,000 personalised books, primarily in the US, since rotating from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, bphomesteading.com who developed it, can order any further copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody developing one in anyone's name, including celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, produced by AI, wiki.snooze-hotelsoftware.de and designed "exclusively to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is planned as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get sold even more.

He intends to expand his variety, creating different genres such as sci-fi, and possibly offering an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human clients.

It's also a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least because it probably took less than a minute to produce, oke.zone and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable content based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are discussing data here, we in fact imply human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is photos. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not believe making use of generative AI for innovative purposes must be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without consent ought to be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really effective but let's construct it ethically and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually picked to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have chosen to work together - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to use creators' material on the internet to assist develop their models, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, wiki.monnaie-libre.fr is also highly against getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of joy," says the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for opentx.cz Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining one of its finest performing markets on the vague pledge of development."

A government spokesperson stated: "No relocation will be made until we are definitely confident we have a practical plan that provides each of our objectives: increased control for ideal holders to assist them certify their content, access to high-quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI strategy, annunciogratis.net a national data library consisting of public data from a vast array of sources will also be offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to increase the safety of AI with, amongst other things, firms in the sector needed to share details of the workings of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a variety of suits against AI firms, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI the law when they took their material from the web without their approval, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of factors which can constitute reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it collects training information and whether it must be paying for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to ponder, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It became one of the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its innovation for a fraction of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I think that at the moment, vokipedia.de if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for bigger jobs. It has plenty of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be quite challenging to check out in parts because it's so verbose.

But provided how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm uncertain the length of time I can stay positive that my considerably slower human writing and modifying skills, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest advancements in international technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents worldwide.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.