Will it be a slam dunk for the US sports betting wagering restriction?
bit.ly
By Natalie Sherman
bet9ja.com
Business press reporter, New York

A ban on sports betting in many US states could be reversed by a case being thought about by the Supreme Court.

The state of New Jersey is challenging the 1992 federal law that mainly disallowed sports betting gambling, explaining the matter as a "states' rights" concern.

The case, which began on Monday, follows New Jersey locals enacted 2011 to legalise sports betting wagering.

A group of sports betting leagues opposes wagering on games, which they fear will motivate match-fixing.

Lower courts have regularly ruled against New Jersey, saying it is within the federal government's power to limit a state's policy options.

The Supreme Court opted to hear the case however amidst a larger shift in American mindsets toward gambling.

Before 1976, Nevada - home of the Las Vegas strip - was the only state with legal casinos outside Native American lands.

But in the last few years, states starving for in the wake of the financial crash have enacted a rash of looser sports betting laws, gathering hefty levies on gaming profits.

There are now 24 states with industrial gambling establishments - approximately double the number a years back.

Despite the main restriction, which already exempts Nevada and 3 other states, unlawful sports betting wagering is rife in the US.

Americans position about $154bn in prohibited sports betting bets every year, according to the American Gaming Association.

The association's president, Geoff Freeman, described the federal ban, external as an "utter failure" earlier this year.

It states the UK is an example of a nation where sports betting wagering is commonplace.

"It's time for Washington to stop depriving states of crucial tax earnings and enable them to gain the rewards of a regulated market," Mr Freeman said.

More than 15 states submitted papers in assistance of New Jersey in the event. A handful have currently passed laws to authorise sports betting wagering in the event of a modification.

'Times have actually changed'

On Monday, as lawyers started arguments for the Supreme Court, some more conservative judges appeared sceptical of the existing law.

The court is anticipated to make a decision in June 2018.

"If we achieve success here we could have bets being taken in New Jersey within two weeks of a choice by the court," stated outbound New Jersey governor Chris Christie after attending the court hearing. "We're prepared in New Jersey - we're all set to go."

Regardless of the court's final judgment, Congress might also use up the debate amidst broader conversation about online video gaming and e-sports betting.

Even a few of the professional sports betting leagues have begun to alter their positions on the concern of gaming.

Adam Silver, National Basketball Association commissioner, supported a federal law that would develop a consistent set of guidelines throughout the US. "Times have altered," he composed in a 2014 opinion piece, external.

Addicts fighting with mobile sports betting

3 October 2017

The challenging issue of problem gambling

31 August 2017
bit.ly